To: Immerito; TribalPrincess2U
9 posted on
08/04/2011 6:48:24 PM PDT by
Morgana
(I never said a thing.....................)
To: Morgana
At least she has her breasts covered.
14 posted on
08/04/2011 6:53:46 PM PDT by
TribalPrincess2U
(The democRATS—just doing the groundwork for al Qaeda?)
To: Morgana
Maybe my memory is a bit hazy, but I dont recall a big storm when that flick hit the theaters.
To: Morgana
I clicked on this thread because I remember how Brooke Shields' mother got her to model suggestively at the same age. The motivation was the same then, thirty years ago, as it is for this girl's parent's today. They know that a fast way to fame and fortune for a child blessed with beauty is to pimp her to the prurient interests of pedophiles. Brooke's father, Frank, opposed the project, but was shunted aside. The Shields were a fairly wealthy 'respectable' WASP family from the north shore of Long Island.
So my conclusion is that this pimping of youngsters has always been socially acceptable. We just don't like to admit it. It is a reflection on the state of our society ... our Judeo-Christian society.
To: Morgana
i was thinking the same thing.. I even remember the Playboy spread on Malle’s film from back then...Susan Sarandon...what a waste
man she had a natural body built for speed back then
her daughter today does too
silly people though
why do these pretty little girls folks so sexualize always...and I mean always...have such eyebrows
no amount of waxing gives a female eyebrows like that
75 posted on
08/05/2011 9:51:36 AM PDT by
wardaddy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson