This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 08/01/2011 7:08:56 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 08/01/2011 4:08:45 PM PDT by Kevin in California
But that is the reality. Should we have used pretend income figures? How does using real numbers based on current law a bad thing?
“you can’t get 100% of what you want when you only control 33% of the government. “
Thats the way of DC Beltway/Big Pravda speak playbook.
We control 100% ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of a government FUNCTION, which the public has been brainwashed into thinking and chanting mentally otherwise.
One man's hyperbole is another man's resolve.
That's a good way to put it. We may not have known that some of these reps were garbage when we voted them in, but now that we do, our mission is clear.
and we won’t even control that if we are perceived to be responsible for tanking everyone’s 401Ks. We fought the good fight. We can stand on that when the time comes. We can’t stand on an obstructionist platform that resulted in American’s losing billions in retirement savings. What good does it do us to win a battle that costs us the war? The Tea Party forced real defendable change.The credit is all ours. We live to fight another day and we will. we must.
Big time...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.