I largely agree, but what I'm hoping to avoid is something where Defkalion offers "X, Y and Z" as evidence, and skeptics say "But what we really wanted to see is A, B and C!" for proof. If there is a sort of shared concensus amongst the various parties of what steps need to be taken then this can be avoided.
Of course, once an E-cat finally ships to a private customer none of this will be necessary. The problem is with any financial risks being born until that point.
I largely agree, but what I'm hoping to avoid is something where Defkalion offers "X, Y and Z" as evidence, and skeptics say "But what we really wanted to see is A, B and C!" for proof. If there is a sort of shared concensus amongst the various parties of what steps need to be taken then this can be avoided. It's not that hard.
Allow an independent auditor to supervise the construction steps to make sure there are no hidden power lines. When I see that only the like-minded are invited as witnesses and there is no means to audit how the device was constructed, that sets of alarm bells. It's just too similar to the global warming bad science.