“Why would NASA be in consultations with a scam artist?”
First response. They meet with the president don’t they.
Second response. Attributing any validity to one entity based on an unclear association with another entitiy is a logic error.
Third response, NASA will talk to about anybody, they were even doing some antigravity research based on some iffy work by a lone scientist a decade or so ago.
Fourth response, you are reaching too hard, if you have to list reasons that you aren’t being scammed at some level you feel you might be being scammed. Listen to the force Luke.
Ten years ago, I tried to get into the game. He turned me down. I don’t believe the man is a liar. I do think it is comical that all these assistant professors believe that he owes them a detailed explanation though.
Spelling error. It should read "loon."