Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dila813

It’s rounded down from 14,700. And that was in 2007. A more accurate figure would be 15,000.

If you have a problem with a fact from a scientific publication, then publish a counter argument in the same journal. It shouldn’t be that hard to disprove if you’re as right as you think you are.

Until then, it’s the best evidence we have. Far better than whether you think it smells good.


320 posted on 08/01/2011 7:18:50 PM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

ok, so it is 14700, that is still a very nice number

why not 14689? why so rounded?


321 posted on 08/01/2011 7:24:19 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Can you give me the pub ref on that quote?, I have a friend on the phone that has them all and is going to verify the number for me.


322 posted on 08/01/2011 7:26:46 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson