From beginning to end everything you write is an utter distortion and turning upside-down of reality. Your first sentence here is wrogn. The physics community is not surprised. It is just saddened that this fraud continues to be perpetrated despite folks simply knowing better.
Moreover, there is no breakthrough. A breakthrough occurs when a probleme the solution of which had been eluding serious researchers for years is solved in a way generally accepted by the experts in the field who have been trying to solve it. So far there has been nothing besides "claims." No one has demonstrated a thing, as demonstration is normally taken in the physical sciences.
Or this: the two professors were vehemently criticized, abused, insulted and ridiculed for daring to suggest that fusion react ions occur at room temperatures inside a solid matrix
No. They were ridiculed for attempting to put a fast one over on the physics community. Their claims were taken at face value and folks made concerted efforts to replicate and understand their results. Doubt turned to outrage when outrageous tactics were taken in an effort to silence those who asked questions and demanded real physical proof.
From beginning to end everything you write
***Your reading skills betray that perhaps you do not have the PhD you claim to have. I posted an ARTICLE; the Author of the Article WROTE that.
The physics community is not surprised. It is just saddened that this fraud continues to be perpetrated despite folks simply knowing better.
***So, now do you speak for the physics community? The author of this piece has a PhD in Physics and is not anonymous. You are anonymous. His level of credibility is far higher than yours.
Moreover, there is no breakthrough. A breakthrough occurs when a probleme the solution of which had been eluding serious researchers for years
***folks have been studying LENR for 22 years and Rossi came up with something that makes it easier to generate the effect, so much so that he intends to commercialize it. That is a breakthrough in most people’s definition, including the author who has a PhD in physics which I gather would stack up nicely against your phantom anonymous PhD.
is solved in a way generally accepted by the experts in the field who have been trying to solve it.
***The experts in LENR have been trying to solve this stuff for 22 years. By your own definition, this is a breakthrough. Your argumentation ability reflects someone who has not made it through a freshman level critical thinking class, let alone a PhD level. Why should Freepers listen to you?
So far there has been nothing besides “claims.” No one has demonstrated a thing, as demonstration is normally taken in the physical sciences.
***Take that up with the scientist J. He, who PUBLISHED his findings rather than hiding behind an anonymous avatar online identity. The excess heat experiment has been repeated worldwide roughly 14,000 times successfully according to an estimate by J. He (Front. Phys. China, 2007).
No. They were ridiculed for attempting to put a fast one over on the physics community. Their claims were taken at face value and folks made concerted efforts to replicate and understand their results.
***And, to date it has been replicated more than 14,700 times.
Doubt turned to outrage when outrageous tactics were taken in an effort to silence those who asked questions and demanded real physical proof.
***There will be further outrage when LENR breaks through the kangaroo court that the physics community set up. I see it happening slowly already. For instance, wusses like you post online anonymously rather than publish your theories publicly for others who have the background can knock it down.