[Don W]

I have tried to explain the “smoky caves” theory to several people over the years and all I get is disbelief and denial that such a thing is even possible.

I try using logic, and all I get are ‘talking points’ spewed back at me.

Following the evolutionists’ own story, we started off dodging fire, then tamed it. We took fire and brought it into our living quarters, giving us warmth, light, and: smoke-filled caves, then smoke-filled tents, then smoke-filled huts, then smoke-filled houses, then smoke-filled towns, then smoke-filled cities, where we finally got too much smoke, so we started cleaning up the air. Now we have cleared the air so much that nobody can tolerate any smoke exposure whatever.

We’re going to have a huge die-off one of these years when something triggers a massive asthma attack among those weakened by their susceptiblility. Who knows what or when it’ll be, but I worry for them.

[boop]

I think that's why we have seen the rise in "sick-building" syndrome in recent years. They build a new, pristine artificially sterile structure that doesn't allow natural air flow. So we become a victim of our "success". You can keep your child in a bubble to prevent them from infection, but when a real virus comes through, the kid's immune system hasn't been tested, therefore is weak and can't fight it off.

Face it, we're dirty creatures, who used to be covered with all kinds of dirt and bacteria. And "hazards" like smoke.

[CSM]

“Following the evolutionists’ own story,”

These same Darwinists are the folks that believe in survival of the fittest, except when it comes to expecting people to be self sufficient. In that case, they believe that we should govern to the weakest elements of society.

[ichabod1]

I don’t worry for them. Well, only to the extent that they’ve made their peace with their maker. Other than that, they may all go to hell.