Hey, you like bony, scrawny women who collapse like cheap cameras, that’s OK with me. But she’s no Diana - never was, never will be.
And can we drop the word “bias”? That’s such a political term and we’re talking about what is basically an entertaining and fun topic.
i respect Diana. she put up with a lot, from a real jerk.
but, i’m confused. you talk about scrawny women.
i think Diana at the same age was much more slender and delicate. Kate in her swimsuit, looks athletic, with muscular legs, not scrawny.
...and, i like that Kate was his TUTOR. beauty AND brains!
Kate is prettier than Diana was at 29, and will age well.
Diana was a knockout in her 30s, but Kate will be even moreso.
Cheap cameras might shutter, but they don’t collapse. Beyond that I will forestop the give and take. They are totally different women. Di was show and short on substance. Remember, Di was trained as a nanny. Kate has an actual collegiate diploma and shows that she is (and has) learned. I’m impressed with her aplomb, her presence, and yes, her aspect. She’s a “got it” gal. Case closed with prejudice.
So far as “bias” is concerned, the word is neither political nor apolitical. It means “to give a personal and unreasoned judgement.” I think we have enough evidence of that here, do we not? sd
“But she’s no Diana - never was, never will be.”
Thank God & Prince William!
Diana had a good heart and a genuine love of people. She was also a bit neurotic. Let's face it. She was nuttier than squirrel turds.
Still, neither she nor Charles deserved the way they treated each other. He should never had married her if he intended to continue with Camille; however, she grew up around royals and knew how they behaved.
Let's hope that Will and Kate break the "Tradition."