To: SunkenCiv
4 moons, huh?
They should give back to Pluto it’s planetary ranking.
5 posted on
07/22/2011 11:24:39 AM PDT by
hattend
(Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
To: hattend
Well, Pluto’s a “dwarf planet” so I guess those moons are mini-me’s...
6 posted on
07/22/2011 11:28:06 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
To: hattend
Just because they say incorrectly that Pluto isn't a planet, doesn't mean we have to accept these snobbish rules.
Pluto's a planet, pure and simple.
15 posted on
07/22/2011 11:54:48 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: hattend; SunkenCiv
I agree. I understand the logic of the decision, but Pluto should still be a planet if for no other reason than tradition and the great story of its discovery. Thank goodness they got the New Horizons mission off before Pluto was demoted!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson