Why are you defending a cop who was trespassing on the neighbor’s property?
Do you believe that trespassing and shooting a law abiding citizen’s dog is acceptable behavior for a police officer in America?
I’m defending the idea that you need to know all of the facts before jumping to conclusions and pointing out alternative scenarios that would be possible that would make the shooting justified.
Why are you so interested in attacking the officer with minimal facts surrounding the reasons why the officer was there doing what she was doing?
One of the problems we have in our country is the easy accusations that can be levelled at everyone for everything, to the great destruction of reputations and lives. No one is ever patient enough to allow the facts to be learned before passing judgement. I object to that, especially in this kind of scenario.
Obviously, if the shooting was not justified by any kind of self defense of law enforcement purpose, it should be dealt with accordingly, but we don’t know enough, and I am not willing to trash another human being without knowing more, that’s all.
Sorry if that sounds unreasonable.