Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
Got any proof or are you just saying that to make IE inferior in your mind? But even if they are shills it still doesn’t dismiss their findings.

IE isn't inferior in my mind, it is inferior in fact. Anyone can cherry pick results to make a report say anything they want, especially with the testing is sponsored by the guy who you determine is the best. Ask any serious web programmer and you'll find it fairly consistent that IE does not

1 - comply with standards

2 - is highly inefficient with rendering Javascript

3 - tries to set their own standards in order to make others comply with them.

Here's a related article which is a little less biased than the press release.

Is Internet Explorer 9 King of Malware Fighters?

20 posted on 07/18/2011 11:18:26 AM PDT by Dubya-M-Dees (Little HOPE... No CHANGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Dubya-M-Dees

IE9 is considered more HTML5 compliant than Chrome or Firefox (last I heard). I know there is some dispute over these findings, but http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ie9_outperforms_other_browsers_for_html5_complianc.php but still you can’t deny IE9 isn’t taking HTML5 seriously.


22 posted on 07/18/2011 11:30:37 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson