[mlo]

"Because it's clear that you know more about the case than she does?"

Because all disagreements are just a matter of who knows more, right?

[krb]

Perhaps, but to think that you know anywhere close the amount of information about this case compared with an individual who was compelled by force of law to sit and listen to all three sides (state, defense, judge) for months is the acme of hubris.

Focusing, when you say:

I’d be asking her some really hard questions too.

Do you actually have a realistic expectation that you will come up with some brilliant angle that she didn't think of already?

That's ludicrous. If you were blessed with the chance to have such an audience with this person, you should be listening instead of talking.