Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: caww
>>I question that 400 figure....<<

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you. It's indicative of your emotional attachment to this case and the need to selectively choose to support your intense desire for vengeance and retribution.

829 posted on 07/12/2011 11:10:19 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
It's indicative of your emotional attachment to this case and the need to selectively choose to support your intense desire for vengeance and retribution.

Where'd you lift that from?

Of course there's a certain degree of emotional attachment for most who have followed this case, anyone with a heart would be affected....a little girl has been murdered and most do want to see whoever did this brought to justice....it didn't happen.

I don't have to be concerned one iotta about vengence or retribution..my God is very well equipped to handle that... now that the jury botched their responsibility before Him...for they all took an oath...and that was too Him.

But what I will do and continue to do so, as others who "care" that justice was not served for Caley, draw attention to the Jury and the system where Caley's case fell between the cracks...and shore them up.

830 posted on 07/12/2011 11:20:44 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear
the “concrete"...evidence of eye witnesses” states..... “This jury foreman was mentioned repeatedly as one of those who took the LEAST amount of notes”..... and this was reported by those who watched them in detail every single day."

Just in case you missed that tid bit of eyewitness evidence.

831 posted on 07/12/2011 11:24:45 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you. It's indicative of your emotional attachment to this case and the need to selectively choose to support your intense desire for vengeance and retribution.

You seem to be the one on every thread trying to discredit everyone with false information.

I question your knowledge of the case and your desire for vengeance and retribution to those that disagree with you.

846 posted on 07/13/2011 9:07:06 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear

What an obnoxious statement. Namecalling, the calling card of the left, appears yet again.

To clarify....the jury foreman made the claim of 400 pages of notes on Greta’s show....this claim is in dispute from reporters and others who viewed this jury daily. They saw no such evidence. Very little note taking was reported. Just because someone makes a claim, does not make it true. Wouldn’t be the first thing this jury did that was questionable. BUT, a claim by someone, not under oath.....is taken as fact by you. Did you give such due diligence to the evidence as it surfaced for the entire duration of the trial? As to the juror, he has taken the offensive in defense of his verdict.......he has some skin in this to look good.


848 posted on 07/13/2011 9:19:02 AM PDT by tioga (2012 - the year Obama gets slapped down by the American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson