Replies

Matthew 7:3 Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?

Yep, that’s a good one. That’s why I have accepted the jury’s decision. I haven’t accused the jury of anything. I have consistently said that we were not in that jury and none of us know exactly what happened and not to judge what the jury did.

I have accepted the jury’s decision. I haven’t accused the jury of anything. I have consistently said that we were not in that jury and none of us know exactly what happened and not to judge what the jury did.

That is your right. It is also your right to pray for Casey as you said you are doing.

As I told you last night, I will pray for little Caylee.

We will disagree about the verdict and who we want to pray for. No one will change your mind, and you won't change ours.

There's nothing left to be said...

I have consistently said that we were not in that jury and none of us know exactly what happened and not to judge what the jury did.

You do know that someone can click on your name and read your posts don't you? You have been posted on numerous "Casey Anthony Threads" always defending her - always on the side of the defense - arguing about chloroform and how fast it evaporates, etc.

You are obviously a great defender of Casey's so why not just admit that instead of trying to sound neutral. I am *proud* to admit that I am on the opposite side of the discussion. I imagine the others here that believe she is guilty feel the same way.

I have consistently said that we were not in that jury and none of us know exactly what happened and not to judge what the jury did.

You do know that someone can click on your name and read your posts don't you? You have been posting on numerous "Casey Anthony Threads" always defending her - always on the side of the defense - arguing about chloroform and how fast it evaporates, etc.

OH, no.....I will try to catch the rest of the jury foreman’s interview on Greta....but a lot of what he said alarmed me. For instance.....jury instructions told them that they could examine a witness’ testimony and believe all or part or none of it. When it came to George, they wanted to convict him of murder...instead they should have discounted his testimony if they wished, but the rest of the evidence stood. Did they request any readbacks? Did they examine ANY evidence? NO, they did not. In 11 hours they walked out of their eager to go home. Their homecoming was not what they expected. Today through TV and the internet we have the ability to see all the evidence, too. We know what they did or did not do in that jury room. I find them seriously lacking. I am talking about their lack of serious deliberations.......NOT their souls.

In addition, I object to having jurors who were married to convicts, to someone without a high school diploma on the jury...to lots of them. Someone who hasn’t even graduated high school may not have the ability to give due diligence to the evidence, nor the ability of critical thinking. A woman who’s husband died in prison? How about the one who said she couldn’t “judge” anyone....what the heck does a juror do?

No, this trial was a travesty of justice....and it was the jury......let them suffer. Through suffering we are made strong. Nothing wrong with living with the consequences of your actions....it is through rough periods in our lives that we grow. Let’s see what these jurors can do with this.