I wasn’t in the jury nor the jury room so I can’t judge what they did or did not do. They don’t get to see all the things we do so they make decisions on what they are in the court room to see. They are removed when they are not to see things and told to decide on specific testimony in a specific way. From what I’ve heard from jurors who have spoken is that their hands were tied regardless of how they felt about the case.
There you go again with not wanting to make a judgment...now you're sounding like those two jurors whos said the same thing....perhaps you are simply unaware it's a matter of record they did not ask nor review any of the over 300 pieces of evidence.
how they felt about the case.
How they felt does not play into the equation of reviewing the evidence...and they were told that. But they did not review the evidence...not one single piece and that is reflective, and evidences, their lack of critical thinking..or that they even attempted such.
jurors who have spoken.. their hands were tied
Well they have to blame someone...in order to get the monkees off their backs. The ball was in their court...as you said .."The deciders".........Trying to wiggle out that that they did just that now is like trying to determine 'who put the tape on Caley's face.' Who do they think they're kidding....the judgement was theirs to make...what mattered to them was taking the easy way out because they lacked the skills to do this right...... Not guilty on 'all counts' except lying....says volumes.