To: ZX12R
“We are just hopelessly intellectual, “
yeah I noticed how you were using gossip TV as legal evidence, very intellectual.
so what other parts of the Constitution do you wish to abolish?
596 posted on
07/11/2011 2:43:13 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
so what other parts of the Constitution do you wish to abolish?
That statement is as stoopid as your "I'm ready to fight a new civil war over this", comment. This debate has become an orgy of like minded idiots professing to have a reasoned opinion, vs those that really do. I am long past trying to debate, and am now just in it for the laughs. It is like still trying to convince someone that astronauts really landed on the moon.
601 posted on
07/11/2011 3:03:32 PM PDT by
ZX12R
To: driftdiver
I have a quaetion for you. If we accept that the Casey Anthony jury did the right thing, then do we ridicule the Scott Peterson jury for convicting on about the same or even less evidence? I know you will probably try to deflect and say something on the order of, “apples and oranges,” but which jury was right? Is Scott Peterson going to die for something where no one proved a cause of death or when or where the victim died? Or, do we numbly accept all jury decisions like you seem to do?
606 posted on
07/11/2011 3:23:05 PM PDT by
saminfl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson