No, my opinion is simply that those who watched on tv have NOT seen all of the evidence. The pictures were but an example of evidence tv watchers did not see. Your post, I think #63, suggested that you felt you (if you included yourself in that group of folks who had watched it all on tv) had seen all of the evidence presented. I just don’t think that’s true.
As I’ve noted elsewhere on this thread, I sure thought she was guilty, but I don’t pretend that watching the proceedings on tv is the same as being on the jury.
I am curious - now that it is all over - what KEY piece of evidence did the jury see that the public was not allowed to see that would change the mind of the majority of the public that believe she killed her child?