I answered you. That fact is not necessarily of first degree murder. Got It.
it takes more than that to put someone to death in this country, despite your personal beliefs.
With the evidence presented, she would not have been convicted of first degree murder by practically any jury.
Beyond that, I am not interested in satisfying your apparently insatiable need to keep arguing the case over and over. This thread is not about the case its about threats to the jury after the verdict.
LOL. I am repeatedly asking the same question you cannot or will not answer, Big Shot.
it takes more than that to put someone to death in this country, despite your personal beliefs. With the evidence presented, she would not have been convicted of first degree murder by practically any jury.
I never once said anything about the death penalty, but did say the jurors were too lazy and stupid to deliberate all of the charges, including manslaughter. Go back and see for yourself. Oh, wait -- I'm sure you don't care what I ACTUALLY said, and you're far too busy, LOL. You'd rather manufacture my personal beliefs.
Beyond that, I am not interested in satisfying your apparently insatiable need to keep arguing the case over and over.
Good. Then let's hope you shall stop responding, since you will not answer my initial question. Bye.