That’s fine if it was. I hadn’t come across any information suggesting that it wasn’t an either/or type of conviction. However, having said that, the prosecution still failed to prove its case.
You don’t convict somebody, just because you think they should be convicted.
So you didn’t even know that there were other charges involved in this case, and yet you still think this was a just verdict? Oh my. Now I do understand how Obama got elected, and I fear he might be reelected for the same reason.
I’ll ask two questions again. 1. Since child abuse/neglect charges were available, and it was a proven fact that she did not report the child missing for THIRTY-ONE days, how can it be said she was not guilty of those charges? 2. They found her guilty on all four lying to police charges. SO WHAT WAS SHE LYING ABOUT? And if they could find her guilty of lying, why not any of the other charges?