This article assumes guilt by her co-workers. It says nothing about the fact her co-workers were threatening her.
All BS and all made up angst to get attention and money.
The jury here made a verdict, a lousy one, but it is final.
Now they can just shut the heck up and go back to work.
Their 15 minutes is over. I could care less what they think. They made the decision and they can live with it like everyone else has to.
As my first post in this thread said. I don’t care. All I had to do was read the article and realize it’s a farce to up the ante on how much her story is worth. She condemns her co-workers with no proof, yet as the group talkers have said they all discussed it early on based on non-evidence provided in opening statements that were a bunch of assertions that were never even discussed during the trial. A guilty verdict would have brought in very little, but the not-guilty verdict is likely going to be much more profitable.