In this case, bringing a dog one is not capable of controlling and endangering other people's safety and property, I'd say selfish and shortsighted are better adjectives, but I agree.
Anytime dogs are allowed to mingle there is an opportunity for conflict. In this case the owner had regained control before the cop got involved.
But which dog started the fight? How do you know that the dog that was shot is the dog that started the trouble?
Do you approve of officers forcibly removing your property from your possession before disposing of it?
“In this case, bringing a dog one is not capable of controlling and endangering other people’s safety and property, I’d say selfish and shortsighted are better adjectives, but I agree. “
You accused the owner of the shot dog of endangering other people’s safety and property.
If, however, the poodle started the fight, then it is the poodle’s owner who brought a dog who endangered other people’s safety and property.
The owner of the dog which was shot was calming his dog when the officer ensured by his actions that the dog would become more agitated—by forcibly taking the dog away from him.
Do you approve of officers forcibly removing your property from your possession before destroying it?