Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Thank You Rush
It was Cindy who originally made the error of saying June 9 - the day she had taken Caylee to visit her father on Father’s Day in the rest home. Casey picked up on that date and went with it.

I can’t remember what date George used but he is the one who saw Casey leave the house with Caylee that last morning she was seen - at least by anyone in the family and that would have been on the 16th of June!! I think Cindy explained it on the witness stand. She was a week off about Father’s Day.

It is probably going to be just me who sees it this way but that's okay. I said Susan Smith killed her kids a week before they found them and sometimes I have a lot of luck reading sinister people.

The way I think it went is like this. Casey said June 9th and for whatever reason Cindy picked it up and went with it. Cindy is a nut for details. She would have known exactly when she last saw Caylee because she took a week of vacation AFTER the June 15th backyard fight and Casey's disappearance just hoping Casey would come back. I'm guessing blow ups on Casey's part happened before and she probably stomped out with Caylee before but never stayed away more than a couple of days. We will never know this for sure because Cindy, George, and Lee would never tell.

I think the reason Cindy went with the 9th was to put the cops off course timeline wise. She already knew Caylee was dead. It was just one of those lies those people tell to divert the rest of us and she stayed with it until that video make it obvious to everyone that Caylee was very alive on June 15, 2008.

Then George chimed in that he saw the 2 of them leave the house on June 16, 2008. I have never believed that one. Likely Cindy told him to say that in order to reset the timeline again. In one of the Rick/Shirley emails I believe someone in the family was told that when the Anthony's got up at about 7:00 a.m. on June 16th Casey and Caylee were already gone. It might have been Cindy's mother who told her brother that.

I think that holds more with Casey's personality. After Cindy choked her in the backyard there is no doubt in my mind that Casey had a major blow up and gathered Caylee up threatening Cindy that she would never see Caley again and then Casey stormed off.

The thing to remember here is ANY statement made by an Anthony is highly suspect. They all lie and mostly do so all of the time. If one of them said the sky is blue I'd have to go outside and check for myself.

808 posted on 07/07/2011 6:14:18 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies ]


To: An American In Dairyland

“”She would have known exactly when she last saw Caylee because she took a week of vacation AFTER the June 15th backyard fight and Casey’s disappearance””
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Can you fill me in on that backyard fight? I have seen reference to it without any details.

I think we’re all confused at this point but we’re still able to put it together better than the jury did.

I asked the question on another thread how Cindy could have been so positive when it was she found the ladder left up at the pool and the gate at the fence was left open. Did she keep a diary or what? I thought that probably Casey did that to draw suspicion away from her.

Testimony was that she went to work and reported it to her fellow employees the next day. The reply I got was she remembered it because it was the day after she and Caylee had visited her father in the rest home - Father’s Day. It would appear that she wasn’t on vacation at that time.

George testified that he got up that morning with Caylee and fixed breakfast and I believe she was watching TV, Cindy wasn’t home. He had checked Casey’s room when he got home from work the night before and Casey wasn’t home yet. He did say that she left the home with Caylee that morning but didn’t say what time Casey came out of her room or showed up. That was just kind of left hanging.

Always more questions than answers. I guess this will be another COLD CASE file, right? Someone did something but who, what, when and how? Do you think another investigation will be opened to find those answers? Never happened in the OJ case after the “not guilty” verdict so I guess it won’t happen here either.


823 posted on 07/07/2011 6:48:13 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson