Prove it.
You cannot put Casey’s fingers on that tape.
You want to believe she did it, and she probably did. But you are willing to kill her because of “probably?”
Pretty easy to say in your living room.
“You cannot put Casey’s fingers on that tape.”
Sure you can by connecting the dots if you have a brain, which this jury did not, unfortunately.
Oh, I suppose somebody could have broken into Casey’s house, stole the duct tape and used it to put around Caylee’s nose and mouth, before throwing her out to be eaten by animals.
Didn't have to be death. There were lesser charges on which they could have convicted her. I agree the state didn't prove premeditation (although how does one explain the computer searches for "neck breaking" and "chloroform" and "punches to the kidney" prior to Caylee's disappearance?)
Again, hard to get any conviction when there are jurors that stated in voir dire they "didn't feel they could judge another person" and are put on a jury anyway!
I agree with you there. I did not think there was enough evidence to warrant 1st degree murder / death penalty — although I felt it was deserved. I think the prosecution should have had more charges on the table for jury consideration. But I fail to see how counts 2 and 3 were found to be “not guilty”.
Who wants to kill her? Not reporting her disappearance for a month.. what do you say about that? Somebody did put duct tape on the baby. Casey knows who did it; her parents do to.
Or do you suggest a total stranger was responsible? Odd..I don’t seem to remember the defense mentioning a dark stranger lurking in the shadows.