So I will ask you the same question I asked a minute ago. Prove to me from the testimony given that it was a murder rather then an accident. Once you do that then prove from the testimony given that it was Casey who inflicted the injury that caused death.
If you can’t do that I would suggest that it’s not the jury or those who didn’t see the definitive testimony that proved murder who are the morons.
Well all and good. Casey will be free, and can make millions of dollars off of her dead daughter. Last night a poster said the National Enquirer claimed she was pregnant; a coworker told me yesterday that on GMA that first thing she was going to do was have another baby to “fill the void” Caylee’s death made. On Boortz yesterday heard she already had a porn offer.
Will you still feel vindicated if another of her children winds up dead?
“Prove to me from the testimony given that it was a murder rather then an accident.”
The prosecutors did a great job of proving this if you’ve been keeping up with the trial...it’s all out there, still.
The Prosecution even connected the dots with great evidence. The jury was filled with a bunch of idiots who took 10 hours to not review one transcript or one piece of evidence.
It was a frucked up jury, not better than the OJ jury. They have no idea what the concept of “reasonable doubt” is. Worse they were lazy in not reviewing the evidence...they were played for fools by Beaz and they proved Baez was right to figure them for mental midgets.
You're just rambling. It's not our job to educate you on the facts of this case if you are too lazy to do it yourself.