“ALL THE DEFENSE HAS TO DO IS TO PRESENT SOME REASONABLE DOUBT.”
The defense will always be able to hire a so called expert to dispute the evidence. So in your opinion all murderers should be free if there wasn’t a witness or the murder on TV.
The prosecution in this case did not present their “experts” to convince the jury...I guess those were “so called experts “ too.
Your hyperbole is not a logical response.