Plain, old common sense will convict her. None of the defense’s convoluted story telling is going to help her.
If the jury has common sense, she’ll be found guilty. That’s a pretty big “if” though, remember the old saying about common sense not being so common. From where I sit, the prosecutors have so far put on the best case. The defense’s case sounded more like someone who’s spent too much time with the bong, spinning wild conspiracy theories with no basis in logic. Sort of like one or two (ahem) folks who post on these threads.