BALONEY. This case had both substantial amounts of DIRECT and CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence.
Tell the truth, just how closely did you watch this trial??
BALONEY. This case had both substantial amounts of DIRECT and CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence.
Tell the truth, just how closely did you watch this trial??
You are right Truth. I watch both the Scott Peterson and Muchael Peterson. Both circumstantial..both convicted 1 st degree BTW anyone remember Srawberry Shortcake??? All were so worried she would hang the jury
Truth keeper, you cannot let posters, who admit to not having followed the trial and yet bloviating with certainty as to an outcome, give you pause. There may be all sorts of wildcards on the jury, but unlike the ignorant opiners on this thread, jurors will have heard and have access to all of the evidence. Just roll your eyes at those on this thread who declare definitively an outcome.
That's exactly right....so Casey will have to "pay for what happened" but the degree of is what's at stake. I can't imagine the jury not convicting her, however stranger things have happened.
In my mind she'll likely get at the most 25 yrs. considering time already served, or at the least 4 years. Second only to walking.
If found guilty where do you think she'll serve her sentence?, haven't heard anything about this yet.
I watched enough to form an opinion, just like you did. See my #482, and have a great Independence Day.