Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Palladin

Do they need to know how Caylee died ??? for a conviction


854 posted on 07/03/2011 2:32:42 PM PDT by paul revere is riding (I'm really a Paula.....Go Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]


To: paul revere is riding

No...not legally.


857 posted on 07/03/2011 2:34:06 PM PDT by MEG33 (God Bless Our Military Men And Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

To: paul revere is riding
Do they need to know how Caylee died ??? for a conviction

Nope.

858 posted on 07/03/2011 2:34:11 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (I STAND WITH SARAH...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

To: paul revere is riding

No. Not in a circumstantial case. It is the sum total of all the incriminating evidence that clinches a circumstantial case.

As an example...Dr. Bierenbaum killed his wife in his NYC apartment. Cut her into pieces. Put them in duffle bags. Drove to the airport...put her remains in his private plane. Flew out over the Atlantic Ocean. Dumped her remains which were never found. He was convicted of murder without the prosecution ever proving the exact method of her death—strangulation? Maybe.

The doc was convicted and is still in jail.

There are many other cases where a body was never recovered and exact manner of death never proven where the perps were convicted by the efforts of a shrewd prosecutor meticulously building a circumstantial case block by block, piece by exquisite piece to convince a jury.


874 posted on 07/03/2011 2:41:23 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarah Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson