Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why doesn’t John Adams have a memorial?
Washington Post ^ | 07/02/2011 | Akexander Hefner

Posted on 07/02/2011 6:59:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: SatinDoll

RE: Uh, we don’t build memorials to lawyers

Obviously, Abe Lincoln must have been an exception.


61 posted on 07/03/2011 6:25:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

You would be correct.

It has been estimated that everyone with even a drop of European blood is well over 99% likely to be a descendant of Charlemagne.

Even if some few are not, their likely mate is over 99% likely to be one, so their children will be.

Anyone who has children who have children who have children - eventually becomes the ancestor of a large % of humanity.


62 posted on 07/03/2011 6:41:01 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Thanks for the ping. IMHO, Adams deserves a memorial, imperfect though he was. One of the key things he did right was pick Washington as CIC of the Continental Army...


63 posted on 07/03/2011 9:44:55 AM PDT by Pharmboy (What always made the state a hell has been that man tried to make it heaven-Hoelderlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I don’t remember that scene. Maybe I’m talking about a different movie. This was on a CD and produced by the Mormon Church.


64 posted on 07/03/2011 10:37:41 AM PDT by Eastbound (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
"What revolution, save the American revolution, ended up being for the better? I can’t think of any."

Nor can I. It took a special culture for it to succeed here. Our culture is far different now and, with the huge increase of government dependency, I doubt that a renewed effort to reinstate the Constitution would succeed now...certainly not at the ballot box.

65 posted on 07/03/2011 12:00:01 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

>Actually Napoleon was very pro-American. His father had lived here a while.<

So did his 2nd uncle. Even when uttered on his deathbed ‘they wanted me to be like Washington” (lost in translation), Napoleon in an autob I read 4 years ago, maintained a hidden fascination and worship of Washington and Jefferson.


66 posted on 07/03/2011 12:43:19 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

For many it was to retrieve the ancient rights of free Scotsmen. That was a two-fer.


67 posted on 07/03/2011 1:35:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Some of us "less so" than others of course.
68 posted on 07/03/2011 1:37:55 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I remember there being some controversy when Roosevelt was added. He doesn’t really belong there. As I recall, Borglum added him because he was a fellow “progressive”, which seems more plausible to me.


69 posted on 07/04/2011 6:35:14 AM PDT by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You’re right that his descendants know who he is. I’m on, through my maternal line, and was very proud growing up to study his and Abigail’s letters to each other, among other things. It’s hard to take liberal notions of female repression seriously when you’ve learned about a woman like Abigail Adams who stayed home and kept the family going while her husband was off starting a country.


70 posted on 07/04/2011 6:45:24 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I thought it was superb.

Nice to see a film or TV series about 1776-1783 that didnt have the British as Redcoat nazis and didnt reduce the conflict to simplistic tosh (yes, Mr Patriot Gibson, thats you)


71 posted on 07/12/2011 3:38:01 PM PDT by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson