Agenda 21 is a UN program. All of the materials that are sent to cities originate from UN offices. Why do we have a UN? They are going to be in charge when the New World Order gets launched. So if you wish to bring it all to a halt, help GET THE US OUT OF THE UN and it will all die a quiet death. It is a waste of resources to fight Agenda 21 by itself.
If there is a tree that needs pruning every year, do you want to call out the tree trimmer every year to cut four branches or would you rather a lumberjack cut the tree down?
A clearer view of the United Nations and its intentions.
The creation of the League of Nations was the first international attempt to start a New World Order. Since President Wilson wouldn’t join, it failed. Then came along the United Nations which Alger Hiss, a charter member of the Council on Foreign Relations coaxed us to join in 1945.
World regionalism is spelled out clearly in the U.N. Charter, Chapters 8 through 11, using such terms as “regional arrangements, intergovernmental agreements, and metropolital areas.” Advocates of one-world socialism have already divided the world into 85 regions for policing purposes. In adopting the U.N. Charter, Congress has established the Charter as the Supreme Law of the land (Fugi v. State of California, 1950-52).
“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” — Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915
“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” -M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.” — Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World”
(1931)
“... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” — H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)
“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial,
political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today
Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World
Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The
New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.” — excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.’” -excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in the New York Times (October 1940)
All these are copied off of the Internet. Any doubts, dig them out for yourselves.
Bingo! ALL of this needs to be cut off at the ROOT.
For the life of me I can not recall one positive, valuable thing that the UN has ever done (sort of like the current administration). (I'm sure there must be at least one small effort over all of these years, but it matters not.) The UN has been a completely EVIL entity from its onset, the US (and maybe some of the few allies that we still have) needs to completely remove itself from the UN, and completely remove the UN from US soil.
I wonder if we will ever have a Presidential candidate that will include the elimination of US participation in the UN as part of their platform?
Good summary in B4Ranch’s post #40.