Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
Damn. A bent op rod is one thing. A broken receiver does not speak well for the rifle itself.
27 posted on 06/17/2011 5:29:46 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: MileHi
A broken receiver does not speak well for the rifle itself.

It speaks of a horrendously-abused rifle.

If the gas-port pressure is correct, the energy of the properly-pressurized gas is consumed in compressing the op-rod spring and in loading the next round.

If the gas-port pressure is too high, the op-rod/bolt assembly is essentially a miniature pile-driver pounding on the back of the receiver.

The rifle action overall is exceptionally strong.

The common description of the original Garand proof-testing is along the lines of:

Mr. Garand built up progressively higher proof loads in increments of 5,000 lbs. pressure, from the regular proof load of 70,000 lbs. to the extreme figure of 120,000 lbs. per square inch. At this later figure, cracked left lugs on the bolt began to be encountered. A gun in which the bolt had the left lug cracked by one of these excessive high pressure overloads was then fired an endurance test of 5,000 rounds of service ammunition, using the cracked bolt, which showed no further deterioration.

51 posted on 06/17/2011 9:31:38 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson