Difficult to believe that. And as long as the most popular name for newborn baby boys in Europe is "Mohammed" I'd argue they still have a very significant problem.
Just watch “Demographic Winter.”
http://fi.cross.tv/30550
When society becomes prosperous they have fewer children.
Bunk. I'm in Europe all the time. Central Paris looks like Africa - both Central and Northern. Certain suburbs are heavily Arab. The only places not like this are in the countryside.
The only countries not like that in Europe are former Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact countries - Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and the Baltics mainly (Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia). There's no political correctness in those countries; intensely nationalistic, they're righteous about their land.
Whatta concept.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics. The men who bombed the public transportation in London were English: legal British subjects, born in England, English-speaking, attended English schools. The “youths” who keep burning cars in France are French, as their legal nationality: second- or third-generation French-born citizens.
Sort the births by the ethnicity of the parents’ surnames, and we’d learn something useful ... only we already know it.
An outright lie; who are you going to believe, the article or your lying eyes?
This same demographic scenario is playing out right here in the US, and is being downplayed (if not outright ignored). Anybody walking past a playground here in northern NJ can’t miss the fact that in towns that are officially 90% “white”, 2/3 of the children (and the accompanying parents) aren’t. I think they’ve been using 1980 stats for decades at this point.
Even more telling: maternity wards. 2 white babies, 2 black babies, and 10 Hispanic babies. These aren’t junior “guest workers”; they’re here to stay (and automatically citizens). It really will be interesting to see what this means; in NYC a few years ago it meant “gay marriage” didn’t even make it to a vote.
bump
bttt