[DJ MacWoW]

What he believes is that he has no value. He's free to life as long as the majority also believes he has value. Should that change they have the POWER to deny him ANY "rights". He only has rights that a majority grant him.

In that scenario any group larger than one person has the right to take anything that he has including his life.

[Darksheare]

Eactly right.
As I’ve already said three times: If rights come from man, then they can be taken away by same and thus have no meaning.
Thus there are no rights, which would include the push for ‘right to die’ as that would also be nonexistent as well if rights came from man.

So, in the end, pushing for a ‘right to die’ is pointless.
Thus, the position that a ‘right to die’ exists is negated.