Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

My own personal belief, in respect of the values I believe are important, the toddler, “two-year-old Mackenzie Stephens”, should, if she wants to be a mom, adopt children when she, Mackenzie, is grown-up and married. Just my opinion.


4 posted on 06/10/2011 11:37:10 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

Agreed.

For that matter, donor eggs from one of her SISTERS makes more sense genetically than from her mother as they’d contain both her father’s and mother’s genes.


7 posted on 06/10/2011 11:43:36 AM PDT by RockinRight (Who is "Generic Republican" and why does he poll so much better against Obama than anyone else?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli; TheDingoAteMyBaby; Tennessee Nana; RockinRight; beaversmom
Considering the health issues that this girl will likely have as a result of her mutation I think that carrying a child would not be a wise decision.

A quick read on this syndrome shows that she may end up with: high blood pressure, kidney disease, thyroid problems, diabetes , cataracts and weight problems.

Any one of these (absent cataracts) can put the life of the woman an/or the baby at risk.

To me the possible confusion of the child growing up is minor to the issue of the risk of lives.

18 posted on 06/10/2011 12:13:27 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson