[Halfmanhalfamazing]

-——————Oh no, a blog on social justice! Let’s see the issues they cover on the first page-——————

The issues listed are irrelevant. They don’t have the same goals as a constitutionalist would.

-———————Based on what I saw I kind of like this guy. Are you sure you read beyond the title? You probably saw “social justice” and assumed it would be a radical progressive page instead of one espousing Christian charity.—————

When Beck warned us about the dangers of social justice, the progressive evangelical community that’s planting these seeds in the churches went nuts. This website, similarly:

http://blog.beliefnet.com/deaconsbench/2010/03/the-gospel-according-to-beck.html

They’ll tell us who they are.

http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2007/07/jim-wallis-a-new-gilded-age.html

The difference is I’ll take them seriously. You won’t.

[antiRepublicrat]

The issues listed are irrelevant.

What? An organization is defined by the issues it presents. You define them by catch phrases that mean different things to different people and by your vague conspiracy theories. You know, the 9/11 Truthers spun a very convincing tale as well.