I assume members of the Senate or House have been contacted and have seen the video. Do any of them have the balls to call the head of West Point to testify. I doubt it.
The only positive from this is if he wins his case against the protected B!tch then damages awarded SHOULD be much higher due to his lost status in the Army.
The downside is the "if it don't fit you must acquit" scum of the earth lawyers will say "see even the Army blames this guy".