[raybbr]

Under the "math" section:

" Ensuring the Quality, Credibility, and Relevance of U.S. Justice Statistics "

"Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty "

But no algebra, calculus or even basic math books.

[Smokin' Joe]

I can't say that gives me great hope, but like a lot of free stuff, you get your money's worth.

It does look like an opportunity to look under the hood and check out all that mental horsepower we've been funding for all these years.

I have a feeling the Offenhauser we've been told was there is more like a Briggs, but examination will tell.

We'll have the chance to examine the thought foundations of the agendae out there, which could prove interesting.

Much of this stuff looks good in print until you find out someone rounded pi off to an interger early on in the calculations.

Fundamental foundational flaws in thought can topple intellectual castles of cards, and with the outcomes of so many programs what they are, I'd read everything with a critical eye.