OMG we've been living under "Marxism" all these years!
The new freedom here is the FCC’s gaining of power where they don’t currently have it.
You've gone way off script. New freedoms are supposedly for the people. You're talking about a power of government. Governments do not have freedoms or rights, only powers.
It’s Clyburn’s own words.
Copy and paste exact words in relation to net neutrality.
Genachowski came one step away from using the phrase universal access just the other day.
No, he actually said the words "universal access" in relation to -- wait for it -- the subject of universal access! Go figure, how strange that he would do that, actually speak of something in the context of a conversation about it. You could learn from that, argue universal access on the subject of universal access, and argue net neutrality on the subject of net neutrality.
Hey, did you know that the FTC regulates both false advertising and antitrust laws? Is it possible to debate false advertising without bringing antitrust enforcement into the picture? Why yes, yes it is.
-————You’ve gone way off script.—————
I haven’t gone off script at all. The courts told the FCC no, congress told the FCC no, they’ve done it anyways.
-————New freedoms are supposedly for the people. You’re talking about a power of government.-——————
Right. How do you convince people to accept totalitarianism? By convincing them that totalitarianism is a “new freedom”. The freedom from want, the freedom from ISPs, the freedom from rent payments. On and on and on.
————Governments do not have freedoms or rights, only powers.-—————
Governments do have freedoms, ask the 65 million that Mao killed.
—————Copy and paste exact words in relation to net neutrality.—————
This is foolish. You were in the discussion thread. It’s time you ate some carrots or something to stimulate your memory banks.
-————No, he actually said the words “universal access” in relation to — wait for it — the subject of universal access! Go figure, how strange that he would do that, actually speak of something in the context of a conversation about it.—————
Fine. All he’s doing is showing how big of a threat to our freedoms that he is.
—————You could learn from that, argue universal access on the subject of universal access, and argue net neutrality on the subject of net neutrality.—————
I’m not foolish enough to look at a totalitarian, and think he’s actually going to separate the two. That’s not how this works. If you’d learned from the road to serfdom, you’d know that.
-————Hey, did you know that the FTC regulates both false advertising and antitrust laws?-—————
Do they play the role of a referee? Or a toll booth?