Seriously, you're going all conspiracy theory on me now. No facts can get through, all must be bent to support the conspiracy. If net neutrality is liberal, and if liberal companies do everything based on liberal ideology above profit, and a liberal company opposes it, well, you have to start making stuff to reconcile the logical conflict.
But I have huge doubts as to if this was any preacher. I can’t find what church he comes from, but my gut instinct tells me that this guy comes from a social justice church. That’s the problem. None of these things are ever as they seem
That's the problem for you, they're usually exactly what they seem. Let's pick an extremely non-progressive case. How about Edwin Crayton in Louisiana, a Christian protesting about Wal-Mart's support of homosexuals? How about St. Petersberg, Florida in 2007, when Christians wanted to protest a gay pride parade and the city tried to stop them? What about the Christian Missouri library employee who was disciplined after refusing to be involved in Harry Potter promotions? The ACLU defended all. Were those "social justice"? I have many more, all quite clear.
I can’t dig beyond the surface of the Shawn Miller case. So the only thing that’s left standing is the left wing media’s/ACLU’s reality.
If the facts don't match the theory, then keep digging and go on the assumption that you just haven't found all the facts yet. You are a conspiracy theorist.
———————Seriously, you’re going all conspiracy theory on me now.-—————
I am? You yourself have pointed out “The real poison, as even Ayn Rand mentioned, is in the incestuous relationship between corporations and government.”(source: EFF/Soros funding thread)
The question isn’t if. It’s when. And Comcast most certainly is positioning itself the way I stated.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2646969/posts?page=17#17
Public utility is often times how it begins. So what conspiracy? It’s all out in the open.
-—————and if liberal companies do everything based on liberal ideology above profit——————
You’re the one who can’t admit that NBC and MSNBC are just as liberal as they were before, with no end in sight to the liberalism, since the comcast merger.
And I’m the one who can’t let facts get through.
—————That’s the problem for you, they’re usually exactly what they seem. Let’s pick an extremely non-progressive case.—————
Sure. Keep citing exceptions to the rule, then try to paint me as a kook while ignoring the whole history of the ACLU.
With the ACLU, progressivism is the rule. Anything you can cite is the exception. Go ahead and ask the wider freeper audience.
-————If the facts don’t match the theory, then keep digging and go on the assumption that you just haven’t found all the facts yet.-—————
If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, I’m going to assume it’s a duck.
Even if I haven’t seen the duck yet. There’s feathers here. I hear quacking.
And all of this to defend marxist net neutrality. You’ve even go so far as to defend the idea of code nationalization!
I’m not the one with a problem with reality here. All the evidence shows that groups like free press are getting what they want. You want to discuss halfmanhalfamazing. All the evidence shows that the FCC is as compromised by insiders as FDR’s administration. You want to discuss halfmanhalfamazing. All the evidence shows that the FCC only listens to groups with a similar agenda. But all you want to discuss is halfmanhalfamazing.
Don’t worry. I know what I’m doing around here is working. You are being surrounded. The facts speak for themselves. There are far less people who are willing to ignore the soros money than you are, and they’ve turned on the concept of net neutrality based on the merits, and the merits alone.
It’s the merits.