[r9etb]

So you can believe Patti LaBelle's bodyguard's excuses for beating somebody senseless, or you can believe a West Point cadet and a video tape that corroborates his story.

I believe that any news article that relies on the word of a lawyer whose income depends on spinning the case in a certain way, is not reliable.

There is more to this story, as there always is when the lawyer is doing the talking.

And yet, FReepers can always be relied upon to gobble up the skittles and unicorns story that the lawyer spins for them.

[moovova]

It looks like you can be...relied upon to gobble up the skittles and unicorns story spun by the black thugs, has-been FattyPatty, and the star struck cops posing with a "defendent" for their Kodak-moment pictures.

There's obviously more to your story than meets the eye, too. You're not worth the keypad you're pounding your silly responses out on...

[dead]

And yet, FReepers can always be relied upon to gobble up the skittles and unicorns story that the lawyer spins for them.

LOL! Man, you have serious issues.

I don't care what the lawyer's opinion is. I heard the cadet describe the incident in his own words and I saw the video tape which partially confirms and does nothing to invalidate his version of events.

Maybe you got some sort of man crush on Patti LaBelle or something, I don't know, but I'm going to eat a skittle and believe my lying eyes on this one.

[rlmorel]

Wow.

[SeeSac]

And yet, FReepers can always be relied upon to gobble up the skittles and unicorns story that the lawyer spins for them.

And there are types like you that ignore the video ...