Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
The amount of both copper and nickel involved is trivial (even assuming worldwide full-blown implementation of E-cat technology), compared to the amounts of each mined today. So I would not expect significant price changes in nickel or copper simply due to the use of nickel as fuel and copper as a byproduct of the E-cat reaction.

But yes, heating/cooling costs would make deserts and tundra more cost-effective to settle. The 9 months of snow on the ground would still get to most people, however.

8 posted on 06/01/2011 12:42:58 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (I stand with Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Liberty1970
The amount of both copper and nickel involved is trivial (even assuming worldwide full-blown implementation of E-cat technology), compared to the amounts of each mined today.

I did the math at one point, and assuming that the entire world's electrical production shift to e-cat, the nickel consumed would be about 1% of current nickel production.

Plus there are several large asteroids with estimates of cubic miles of nickel in them.

12 posted on 06/01/2011 5:06:42 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson