Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PzLdr

able to post via laptop during court recess. the issue of whether the scuttling charges or the torpedoes “sunk” the Bismarck is not settled, at least among those who have actually viewed the wreckage.

See the two links at post #10 for the differing viewpoints.


21 posted on 05/27/2011 8:39:25 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: abb

When James Cameron explored BISMARCK, one of the things he used was a joystick/wire controlled miniature “Alvin” that was able to get into the hull, the superstructure, etc.

He ran the Alvin along the BISMARCK’s torpedo armor belt, on the inner hull. No holes.

Now I can understand the British position. After what BISMARCK did to HOOD [and PRINCE OF WALES], they want credit for taking him out. And, as I said in my post, BISMARCK was a flaming wreck. His range finders were gone. His main guns were toast. He was going nowhere. Unfortunately for the British claims, nowhere included under water. While the DORSETSHIRE’s torpedo attack was serendipitous, it wasn’t fatal.


23 posted on 05/27/2011 12:39:18 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson