Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Woman Who Had Arnold's Love Child
KFI ^ | 5/18/11 | Bill Handel

Posted on 05/18/2011 8:58:52 AM PDT by raccoonradio

The London Daily Mail says a joint investigation by RadarOnline.com and Star Magazine has revealed the name and photo of the woman who had Arnold's child.

RadarOnline.com and Star Magazine are now reporting that Mildred threatened to go public four weeks ago after she was FIRED from her job with the couple.

You can see photos of her baby shower on TMZ.com

Mildred Baena is pictured here in photos from her MySpace page.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: arnold; lovechild; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: raccoonradio

Ooooof. His imaging system must have been switched from “visual” to “infrared only”.


61 posted on 05/18/2011 9:32:36 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
Some people just aren't photogenic. /s
62 posted on 05/18/2011 9:33:57 AM PDT by petercooper (2012 - Purge the RINO's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ExNewsExSpook

perhaps Maria suffered from feminist syndrome. She did not like being the wife in the marriage.

If Arnold had gone for senator she would have stayed.


63 posted on 05/18/2011 9:36:35 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Apparently not you still commented


64 posted on 05/18/2011 9:38:08 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
When Paternity is Established by The Court ...

From what it sounds like, Ahnuld and this woman had already agreed to child support terms and he's been fulfilling them. I don't think there's any real legal recourse for this woman unless he reneges on the existing arrangement.

If she's smart she won't rock the boat.

65 posted on 05/18/2011 9:38:53 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Okay.. How about, “Knock off ten years and 50 pounds”?


66 posted on 05/18/2011 9:38:57 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Does tend to make one wonder how this was kept hidden during his time as governator. Wouldn’t there have been some requirement for him to disclose this type of financial arrangement?


67 posted on 05/18/2011 9:43:09 AM PDT by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

DAYAM!!!! How drunk was Ahnuld when he knocked her up?


68 posted on 05/18/2011 9:44:52 AM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (PAVE THE PLANET!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: farmguy

no.

this is why there are confidentiality agreements.

From the look of things he has stepped up and paid the bills once it was disclosed the boy was his.

The only question for schriver (note she did not change her last name) is why she stayed and why she waited to leave until he was out of office.

There are no angels among the adults in that soap opera.


69 posted on 05/18/2011 9:47:39 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
On the bright side, maybe Shania will finally put out an album that doesn't sound like Pyromania...
70 posted on 05/18/2011 9:48:35 AM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (PAVE THE PLANET!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Under the McGinnis case ( California Supreme Court late 90’s) YOU CANNOT ACCEPT LESS THAN WHAT IS LEGALLY OWED, REGARDLESS AF ANY AGREEMENT YOU MAY HAVE. Look it up, I know about this. They will be Paying a lot.


71 posted on 05/18/2011 9:51:04 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

I laughed for about five minutes after reading your response. People won’t know why I am smiling today...


72 posted on 05/18/2011 9:53:45 AM PDT by Freedom_Fighter_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

She looks like a fat Teresa Heinz Kerry.


73 posted on 05/18/2011 9:54:40 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Sorry, I don’t buy it. You obviously have given this issue LOTS of thought or you wouldn’t have posted the way you did.

It’s OK to stop and gawk...human nature.


74 posted on 05/18/2011 9:54:52 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
Under the McGinnis case ( California Supreme Court late 90’s) YOU CANNOT ACCEPT LESS THAN WHAT IS LEGALLY OWED, REGARDLESS AF ANY AGREEMENT YOU MAY HAVE.

What if Ahnuld was paying more than what he legally owed? He clearly bought this woman a nice house and her silence for 10 years. The price of that has to be far higher than what the law would mandate that he pays in child support.

75 posted on 05/18/2011 9:55:02 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Mutt Lange is the biggest moron...Shania is absolutely gorgeous. She would have had to have done an awful lot to make me look at other women. AN AWFUL LOT!


76 posted on 05/18/2011 9:56:14 AM PDT by oust the louse (The death of Osama is as mysterious as the life of Obama. just sayin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Wonder if Arnold paid for those?


77 posted on 05/18/2011 9:56:36 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
I believe you’re initially thinking of Farfel (dog)

” “N-E-S-T-L-E-S … Nestles makes the very best … chaaawwwwwclate.””

rather than…

Chunky Candy Bar

"Chunky, What a Chunk of Chocolate"
"Open Wide for Chunky"…..”

78 posted on 05/18/2011 9:57:12 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen (The 'Land of Opportunity'... NOW BECOMING... The 'Land of Entitlements'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Actually it is between 25% and 35% of your GROSS INCOME, and THERE ARE NO DEDUCTIONS FOR LIVING EXPENSES. Just ask ANY FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY.


79 posted on 05/18/2011 9:57:25 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
Actually it is between 25% and 35% of your GROSS INCOME, and THERE ARE NO DEDUCTIONS FOR LIVING EXPENSES. Just ask ANY FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY.

Must you yell?

80 posted on 05/18/2011 9:59:19 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson