I will agree with you to a point. But all the people you have mentioned have a very long track record of being solid in their beliefs, except for Savage (gave heavily to Moonbeams campaign) and Barton (He is a self taught/no formal education guy with some questionable claims).
Beck is all of a sudden an expert on great matters. He has no track record for a solid belief. He is all over the map if you listen to him over the last 10 years which I have. When he does involve himself in things, they are usually cannibalized ideas from others. 912 was a reaction to the Tea Party. He blatantly took the Boy Scout pledge and Motto for his 912 ideals. He railed against the tone of the country and pushed the 40 Days stuff and then went on a childish week long slam fest of the Birthers. He pushes himself as a Christian even though Mormonism isn’t really that. I have no problem with him or his religion, but why the charade. He promotes distrust of Obummer but is against releasing the OBL pics to give proof to the non believers because they are being silly. He doesn’t circulate with any real Conservatives. Always Libertarians of other fringe types. He used to do things with Hannity years ago, now he is BOR’s best friend? He always rails that the parties suck but doesn’t give a remedy. He is a Ron Paul supporter. He thinks the FDA is poisoning us and that Pasteurization is dangerous. This is not good stuff. Are there these types of things in the a fore mentioned groups background?
Those are just some things off the top of my head on things that make him far less credible than the rest of the people you list.
“Those are just some things off the top of
my head on things that make him far less
credible than the rest of the people you
list.”
You need to look to the top of your head then. Generally speaking a list of subjective evaluations doesn’t enhance ones credibility.