Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WildSnail
"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," - Justice Steven David

What, exactly, is "modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence"?

The fourth amendment, and all of the others, mean the same thing today that they did when they were written.

This court needs to be smacked down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

60 posted on 05/13/2011 8:02:27 PM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Washi
“.....with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence”?

That is progressive socialist speak> Progressive socialist believe the U.S. Constitution is a “living” document that must change with them, to meet civil duties and safety etc.

Since “We the People” of the United states of America gave those limited powers to the government, why not take them back, since the existing government has clearly demonstrated to all of us that they will continue to abuse the limited authority we have given them!

TAKE IT BACK!

64 posted on 05/13/2011 8:10:26 PM PDT by paratrooper82 (We are kicking Ass in Afghanistan, soon we will be home to kick some more Asses in Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson