Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Regardless of the specific situation the ruling plainly states that police can not be stopped from coming into your home for any reason. They don't need a warrant and they don't need a reason. After all you can always sue them after the fact (until next weeks court ruling).

The fourth amendment is dead.

79 posted on 05/13/2011 7:56:11 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Durus
That's not how disputes are argued. Remember, you argue the facts, then you argue the law, then you argue the person. (something like that).

The "facts" of this case will not ever line up with the facts of another case ~ that is, there will be no similar case ~ and principles found in Sharia law will enter into consideration.

Those future cases will be based on OTHER thoughts in other decisions.

Nothing requires prosecutors or defense lawyers to adhere to this Supreme Court decision, and the best way to nullify it is to simply never resort to it.

Remember, the ONLY case it can possibly match in terms of fact is one where the police have lawful entry. The decision mentions unlawful entry but that's irrelevant here since there was NO unlawful entry!

83 posted on 05/13/2011 8:04:09 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson