Those sentences come directly from the pdf of the court ruling. Look for yourself.
“We hold that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.”
“Now this Court is faced for the first time with the question of whether Indiana should recognize the common-law right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers. We conclude that public policy disfavors any such right.”
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05121101shd.pdf
Now that you have looked at the actual court ruling, how can you argue that either of those sentences been misinterpreted?
No, and I think that it is time to look into the background of the judge that would write such a thing. Who appointed the judges, where they went to law school, etc.