[jaydubya2]

No Warrant,no problem...

[MurrietaMadman]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZL_tZxyBDo bump

[editor-surveyor]

Anyone left still living in Indiana 6 months from now deserves whatever they get!

[Emperor Palpatine]

"incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence"


I could give a crap about modern jurisprudence. The original intent of the Founders is fine with me. Its high time the citizenry gets the tar and feathers and actually treats these morons with robes the way they deserve to be dealt with.

Contempt of court? I have nothing but contempt for this court and these asshat judges. They're traitors, and the one who was a JAG lawyer is a disgrace to the uniform he once wore.

[jocon307]

I had a cop come into my apt. once totally by accident. He scared the heck out of me, I mean he didn’t have his gun out or anything, but I was really startled.

I wondered later what would have happened if I had weed out or something like that.

I guess in Indiana I’d be seriously arrested.

[Mr Rogers]

Can a cop enter your home in hot pursuit of a criminal?

Yes. Including if you are the crook.

[cycjec]

You might beat the rap but you won’t escape the ride.
Good luck on getting your computer, guns, food, etc
back too.

[driftdiver]

David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.

Meaning you only have rights if you have money for a good lawyer.

[papertyger]

Impeachment!

[ichabod1]

If they not doing anything wrong then they got nothin to worry about.

[sargon]

Who in the hell are these SC Justices in Indiana?

You know, I wouldn't be in the least surprised if they were appointed by Republican administrations.

Just a hunch...

[a real Sheila]

I supposed if they come into your house uninvited with no warrant and see a stack of cash lying on your kitchen table they can “confiscate” it as well.

[The KG9 Kid]

"Whoops... Sorry, citizen. We thought you were someone else" PING

Click the link to be added to the "Whoops. Sorry, citizen. We thought you were someone else" PING list.

[GreyFriar]

“Professor Ivan Bodensteiner, of Valparaiso University School of Law, said the court’s decision is consistent with the idea of preventing violence.”

A liberal lawyer who believes in social justice rather than either the constitution or English common law. Just the type to have endorsed the ridding of a European nation of certain undesireable minorities during the 1930s.

[wolfcreek]

Bet they can still bust you if they *happen* to find a roach in the ashtray??

[Repeal 16-17]

This is nothing new for the courts. Governments want unquestioned obedience, even when violating your rights. For example, you can't challenge a court order if you defied that order (even if it would have been reversed).

First, obedience to the state. Then, later you can ask the government if the government violated your rights.

[Vendome]

Wrong!

Not even if they are wearing SS arm bands and swastikas.

What is to prevent an overzealous man or men, under the color of law, from executing you on purpose or by “accident”?

[HKMk23]

I see dead people...

[Abathar]

I bet even the DUmmies are as upset about this as I am...

[loboinok]

I clicked on this expecting it was from the AzConservative.

[hattend]

Professor Ivan Bodensteiner, of Valparaiso University School of Law, said the court's decision is consistent with the idea of preventing violence.

Really? Cops break down a door at 3AM without knocking or announcing, won't shooting start?

Good thing it'll prevent violence.

We've lost our way.