Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Will Escott
Why wouldn’t the marriage be legal?

Probably because of BHO Sr.'s polygamy problem.

42 posted on 05/12/2011 12:58:15 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Menehune56

BHO, Sr, told his university he had divorced Kezia in 1959, before he left Kenya. In 1964/5 he married Ruth Nidesand in Kenya. The marriage was statutory, ie monogamy.

Bigamy has been a crime in Kenya since 1902.

He wasn’t arrested for bigamy and Ruth didn’t cite bigamy as grounds when she divorced him. She cited cruelty.

His family say he divorced Kezia in 1959.

Looks like he might have been telling the truth, for once.

Anyway the INS couldn’t prove bigamy either, and they tried. The British wouldn’t confirm he’d ever been married at all.

If the British said he wasn’t married US law had to presume he wasn’t. So, the marriage was legal.

The big question would have been whether his marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham was bogus. IMHO it was. If the British had asked the INS for details and decided it was they’d have revoked his passport and he’d have been deported ASAP. The INS probably wanted to do just that.


46 posted on 05/12/2011 1:12:25 PM PDT by Will Escott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson