Um, if you check, you will find that for years before total independence, the home nation has control of the offices such as Obama sr would have been dealing with. Now if you have something from MI5 which shows they had an interest in Obama sr then show it or stop this nonsense you keep trying to float.
If I had something from MI5 I wouldn’t be posting it.
Look, bigamy was a criminal offence in the UK and Kenya. Barack Obama, Sr, wasn’t charged with bigamy by either the British or the Kenyans. He wasn’t charged with bigamy by the INS either. It’s quite clear that both the UK and the USA thought he was “a slippery customer”. In other words they thought he was a bigamist. But they didn’t charge him with it. The only possible reason for that was that they couldn’t prove it in court.
It’s happened before and it will happen again.
That isn’t nonsense.
IMHO, the marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham was bogus and that is also a criminal offence. But again they couldn’t prove it, or they didn’t want to try, or they didn’t care. I don’t know which it was.
That isn’t nonsense either.
If you say someone committed bigamy you have to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. No one has. It’s a moral certainty but not a legal one.
As for the British being interested in him, they’d be interested in the son of an Al Quaida, or Taliban member, that’s a racing certainty. They’d jailed his father on terrorism charges in 1949, so they’d have seen him in the same light. Doesn’t matter whether his father was guilty or not, or whether I think it was right to jail Kenyan nationalists or not.
No nonsense in that view.